Israel has carried out airstrikes on Beirut’s southern suburbs, targeting what it claims are Hezbollah’s drone production facilities. The strikes, which took place on the eve of Eid al-Adha, one of Islam’s most significant celebrations, have stirred political and social tensions in Lebanon. This attack came despite the fact that a ceasefire had been in place between Israel and Hezbollah for the past six months, heightening concerns over the fragile peace in the region. The strike on Thursday night followed evacuation warnings for several buildings in the area, where Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant group, is based in Lebanon’s capital, Beirut. While there have been no immediate reports of injuries, the air raids have sparked widespread fear and anxiety, especially on the eve of a major religious holiday.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) stated that the airstrikes targeted a Hezbollah unit allegedly involved in producing “thousands” of drones underground, with funding from “Iranian terrorists.” These claims were accompanied by accusations that Hezbollah had violated the terms of the ceasefire, which had been holding for six months. Israel’s military insists that Hezbollah’s use of drones is central to its offensive capabilities, describing the activities as a blatant violation of international agreements between Israel and Lebanon. According to the IDF, Hezbollah has been extensively using drones in its attacks against Israel, and the drone production facility in question was considered a significant threat.
The airstrikes have caused considerable outrage within Lebanon. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam issued a strong condemnation, stating that Israel’s actions were “a systematic and deliberate attack on our homeland, its security, stability, and economy.” He emphasized the particularly brazen timing of the strikes, coming just before the religious holiday of Eid al-Adha, which is a time for family gatherings and celebrations in the Muslim world. The prime minister expressed his concerns about the strain such actions put on Lebanon’s economy and security, particularly as the country is still reeling from the aftermath of previous conflicts and political instability.
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun also condemned the strikes, calling them a “flagrant violation of an international accord.” Aoun highlighted the deep sense of injustice felt by the Lebanese population, especially in the context of the timing of the attack, which occurred on the eve of a sacred religious festival. The Lebanese president further noted the psychological toll that the airstrikes have taken on the population, generating “renewed panic and fear” just before Eid al-Adha. The strikes have not only escalated tensions between Israel and Lebanon but have also caused widespread displacement as thousands of residents fled the streets following the evacuation warnings.
The attack comes in the midst of an already fragile peace. Since a ceasefire agreement in late November 2023, Lebanon and Israel had been observing a delicate truce, although Hezbollah, the powerful Shiite militant group, was not officially part of the ceasefire agreement. Despite this, there had been a relative calm between the two nations, although the situation has remained tense, with ongoing Israeli military actions in Lebanon and occasional skirmishes.
The Lebanese government has consistently accused Israel of violating the ceasefire through a series of airstrikes and incursions since the truce was struck. In April, Israel targeted a Hezbollah storage facility, allegedly housing “precision-guided missiles” in the Dahieh region of Beirut, while also conducting other attacks on Hezbollah-linked targets in southern Lebanon. Lebanon has repeatedly stated that these actions are clear violations of the truce and undermine efforts to stabilize the region. However, Israel justifies its strikes by arguing that they are necessary to dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure and curb its growing influence, which it claims is destabilizing the region.
Israel’s defense minister, Israel Katz, defended the airstrikes, praising the “perfect execution” of the military operation. Katz further stated that Israel holds the Lebanese government directly responsible for preventing violations of the ceasefire and for stopping Hezbollah’s terrorist activities. He also emphasized Israel’s stance that it is entitled to defend itself from threats posed by Hezbollah, citing the group’s increasing use of drones as a major concern for Israeli security.
While the airstrikes were a demonstration of Israel’s military might, they also serve as a reminder of the ongoing conflict between Hezbollah and Israel. The two sides have fought in multiple wars, with the most recent conflict taking place from 2023 to 2024. That conflict saw extensive Israeli airstrikes and ground incursions into southern Lebanon, as Israel sought to dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure near the border. The war resulted in a significant loss of life on both sides, with the Lebanese authorities reporting around 4,000 casualties, many of whom were civilians, and more than 1.2 million people displaced within Lebanon.
In addition to the human cost, the war had a significant economic impact on Lebanon. The country was already facing severe economic challenges before the conflict, including a crippling financial crisis and widespread poverty. The ongoing violence has only exacerbated these issues, leaving Lebanon’s economy in tatters and its people suffering. With the recent airstrikes, many fear that the situation will only worsen, further destabilizing the region and adding to the already dire conditions faced by the Lebanese population.
The situation is made even more complex by the involvement of Iran. Hezbollah, which has received substantial financial and military support from Iran, is considered by Israel to be a proxy force of the Iranian government. Israel’s actions in Lebanon, including the recent airstrikes, are often framed within the context of the broader regional struggle between Israel and Iran. Israel views Iran’s influence in Lebanon and Syria as a direct threat to its security, especially given Hezbollah’s military capabilities and its hostile stance toward Israel.
On the other hand, Hezbollah has maintained its stance of defiance, often claiming that it is acting in solidarity with the Palestinian cause. Following Hamas’s devastating attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023, Hezbollah fired rockets at Israeli positions, stating that its actions were in support of Palestinians in Gaza. The situation in Gaza, combined with Hezbollah’s growing influence, has intensified tensions in the region, with the potential for further escalations in the future.
While there has been no immediate comment from Hezbollah regarding the recent airstrikes, the group’s leadership has frequently pledged to continue its resistance against Israel. Hezbollah’s actions are closely watched by both Israeli and Lebanese authorities, as well as international observers. Any escalation of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah has the potential to drag in other regional actors and further destabilize the already volatile Middle East.
In the wake of the airstrikes, the United Nations has called for restraint and diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation. The Office of the United Nations Special Coordinator for Lebanon emphasized the importance of addressing disputes through dialogue and diplomacy to avoid unnecessary conflict. The UN also highlighted the humanitarian consequences of the strikes, particularly in the context of the already fragile situation in Lebanon.
As Lebanon grapples with the aftermath of the latest Israeli airstrikes, the prospects for peace in the region remain uncertain. The ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, while holding for six months, is fragile, and tensions are high on both sides. The timing of the attack, just before Eid al-Adha, has amplified the sense of injustice felt by many Lebanese, who view the strikes as an unnecessary provocation. The question remains whether diplomacy and dialogue will prevail, or whether the region will once again be drawn into a cycle of violence.
The international community watches closely, hoping that efforts for peace and stability will ultimately triumph over the forces of conflict.
