The Justice Department is preparing to call a new lineup of witnesses Wednesday as the federal trial of Ryan Routh, accused of attempting to assassinate former President Donald Trump at his West Palm Beach golf club in 2024, enters its eighth day.
The proceedings are expected to focus on weapons evidence, forensic data, and FBI testimony that prosecutors say directly ties Routh to the alleged plot.
What Happened
On Tuesday, jurors reviewed forensic evidence from Routh’s phones and DNA. Investigators presented WhatsApp messages allegedly recovered from his devices, including one where Routh wrote, “I hate him… shan’t get elected again,” referring to Trump. Another message read, “If I can help just let me know what to do.”
FBI experts also testified that Routh’s DNA matched samples found on the rifle grip, a glove, a bag, and other items prosecutors say were recovered from an alleged sniper’s nest near Trump’s golf course. Judge Aileen Cannon, appointed by Trump, urged prosecutors to keep testimony concise and reminded Routh — who is representing himself — not to interrupt court proceedings.
Who Was Ryan Routh
Ryan Routh rose to national attention after his arrest in 2024, when authorities accused him of plotting to assassinate Trump. Prosecutors allege he meticulously prepared for the attempt, acquiring weapons and equipment to carry out the attack. While Routh has pleaded not guilty, the trial has drawn heavy media coverage given its direct connection to a former U.S. president.
Background on the Trial
Wednesday’s witness list includes:
-
Ronnie Jay Oxendine, who allegedly sold Routh the rifle at the center of the case.
-
Multiple FBI agents and specialists, including Patrick M. Lantry, Aaron Thompson, Matthew S. Perry, Garett L. Foo, and Laura E. Haller, who handled forensic examinations.
-
Lazaro and Samuel Plata, whose testimony will be aided by Spanish/English translators.
Prosecutors expect to wrap up their case by the end of this week, after which Routh, acting as his own lawyer, will begin calling his own witnesses.
Public and Social Media Reactions
The case has fueled intense debate online, with Trump supporters calling for maximum penalties and others focusing on the unusual dynamic of a defendant representing himself in such a high-stakes trial. Legal analysts on social media have noted that Routh’s interruptions and self-representation could complicate his defense strategy as the case moves forward.
What Happens Next
If prosecutors close their arguments this week, the trial will soon shift to Routh’s defense, where he is expected to bring forward witnesses of his own. The jury’s decision will likely hinge on whether the forensic and digital evidence presented is convincing enough to establish intent and preparation for the alleged assassination attempt.
This story may be updated with more information as it becomes available.
