Far-right activist Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is currently standing trial after being stopped by border police while attempting to travel to Spain. The 42-year-old was driving a silver Bentley SUV when he was stopped at the Channel Tunnel in Folkestone on 28 July 2025. Police grew suspicious of his “vague replies” and subsequently invoked Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, which grants authorities the power to stop and question individuals passing through UK ports, in order to determine whether they may be involved in terrorism.
What Happened
Robinson was reportedly en route to the Spanish tourist destination of Benidorm when he was stopped by officers. During the stop, police grew concerned about his behavior, noting that his responses to questions were brief, vague, and lacking eye contact. They also found that Robinson was carrying over £13,000 in cash, along with €1,900 (£1,650), which further raised their suspicions.
The officers requested access to Robinson’s iPhone, but he refused to provide the PIN, stating that he did not want them to access his “journalist material.” This led to his arrest under the provisions of the Terrorism Act, which gives authorities the power to seize electronic devices and demand passwords or PINs without a warrant in cases where there are concerns about terrorism-related activities.
The Trial
During the trial, prosecutor Jo Morris outlined the sequence of events, stating that Robinson’s behavior led police to suspect he was acting in a way that suggested involvement in something more than just a routine border crossing. “He gave short, vague replies and made no eye contact,” she said. Robinson, recognized by officers, was led to an interview room, where his phone was seized, and he was asked to hand over his PIN. His response to the request was defiant: “Not a chance bruv… you look like c*** so you ain’t having it.”
Robinson later explained that the phone contained sensitive material related to his work as a journalist, particularly information about “vulnerable girls.” He was also questioned about his decision to purchase tickets on the day of travel instead of booking in advance, which the prosecution argued was “unusual.” Additionally, the car he was driving was a high-value vehicle not registered in his name.
Legal Context and Charges
Under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, individuals can be detained for up to six hours, legally required to answer questions, and must provide access to their electronic devices. Refusal to comply can result in criminal charges. Robinson has been charged with refusing to comply with counterterrorism powers, specifically by failing to hand over his phone’s PIN. If found guilty, he faces up to three months in jail and/or a £2,500 fine.
Defending Robinson, Alisdair Williamson KC suggested that the stop might have been “discriminatory” due to his political beliefs. Robinson’s defense team argues that his political views played a role in the decision to stop and question him, with the suggestion that he was unfairly targeted due to his far-right activism.
Public Reactions
The trial has garnered significant attention, especially among Robinson’s supporters and detractors. Robinson, a well-known figure in far-right circles, has long been a controversial character due to his outspoken views on issues such as immigration and Islam. The case has raised questions about the balance between national security and civil liberties, particularly in relation to the powers granted under the Terrorism Act.
Supporters of Robinson have argued that the stop was politically motivated, while critics point to the potential national security concerns that led to the border police’s actions. His refusal to comply with the police request has also sparked debate over the limits of authority and the protection of journalistic materials.
What Happens Next
The trial is ongoing, and the court has yet to reach a verdict. If convicted, Robinson could face a significant penalty, but his defense team is pushing for a dismissal of the charges, claiming political bias in the stop. The case continues to unfold as both sides present their arguments.
Closing Line
This story may be updated with more information as it becomes available.
