On Thursday, El Salvador’s National Assembly, dominated by President Nayib Bukele’s party, approved controversial constitutional changes that will allow indefinite presidential reelection and extend presidential terms to six years. The move has sparked significant debate within the country.
Constitutional Changes and the Vote
The proposal, introduced by Ana Figueroa from the New Ideas party, includes amending five articles of the constitution. Among the key changes are the elimination of the second round of presidential elections and the introduction of indefinite presidential reelection. With New Ideas holding a supermajority in the assembly, the vote passed overwhelmingly—57 in favor, 3 opposed. The changes also align presidential and congressional elections, moving Bukele’s current term end date to June 1, 2027, and allowing him to seek reelection two years earlier than originally scheduled.
The Rise of Bukele’s Political Influence
Nayib Bukele, who secured an overwhelming reelection last year despite a constitutional ban on consecutive presidential terms, has been a polarizing figure. After a 2021 Supreme Court ruling, influenced by his party, allowed him to run for a second term, the approval of indefinite reelection now consolidates his hold on power. Bukele’s popularity has surged due to his tough stance on street gangs and security policies, though critics point to his government’s controversial negotiations with gangs and suspension of constitutional rights under a state of emergency.
H2: The Opposition’s Concerns
While Bukele’s allies tout the changes as an opportunity for stability, opposition lawmakers, including Marcela Villatoro of the Nationalist Republican Alliance (Arena), warn of the dangers posed by indefinite reelection. Villatoro argued that the move threatens democracy by consolidating power, fostering corruption, and undermining political participation. Critics fear the changes will lead to authoritarianism and weaken democratic institutions.
H2: Bukele’s Response and the Broader Impact
Bukele, who has cultivated a populist image as “the world’s coolest dictator,” has not commented publicly on the new legislation. However, his political style—marked by heavy-handed security measures, increased centralization of power, and a growing cult of personality—has inspired similar movements in the region. While the approval of indefinite reelection strengthens Bukele’s hold on power, it also raises significant concerns about the future of democracy in El Salvador.
H2: Conclusion
As the National Assembly’s approval of these constitutional changes signals a potential shift towards more autocratic rule, the political landscape in El Salvador is entering a new, uncertain phase. While Bukele’s supporters view this as a step toward political stability, his critics are deeply concerned about the erosion of democratic principles and the concentration of power in the hands of one individual.
Closing:
El Salvador stands at a crossroads. The community’s response to these changes will shape the country’s future, as the balance between political control and democratic values hangs in the balance.
