London, UK (AP) — The Court of Appeal has reduced the sentence for Mahek Bukhari, who was originally sentenced to a minimum of 31 years and 8 months for her role in the murders of Saqib Hussain and Hashim Ijazuddin in February 2022. The new ruling, announced on Friday, cuts her sentence to 26 years and 285 days after the appeal judges agreed that her young age and immaturity were not sufficiently taken into account during her trial.
What Happened: The Murders and Car Chase
The tragic events unfolded on February 11, 2022, when Mahek Bukhari, then 22 years old, and her mother, Ansreen Bukhari, were involved in a violent high-speed car chase on the A46 in Leicester. The pair had been entangled in a blackmail plot involving Saqib Hussain, who had allegedly threatened to release sexually explicit material of Ansreen unless she paid him £3,000.
Saqib Hussain and Hashim Ijazuddin, both 21, were lured to a “meeting” at a Tesco car park in Hamilton, Leicester, under the pretense of returning the money. However, the meeting quickly turned into an ambush. Mahek Bukhari, her mother, and accomplices pursued the pair, ramming their car off the road, resulting in a tragic crash. Both Hussain and Ijazuddin died in the incident.
The attack was followed by a calculated and dangerous car chase involving two vehicles, with the victims’ car being deliberately rammed off the road by the Bukharis and their associates. Prosecutors described the event as an extreme escalation of an already volatile situation.
Appeal and Reduced Sentence
Mahek Bukhari was initially sentenced to 31 years and 8 months for her role in the murders. However, her legal team argued that her young age and lack of maturity should have warranted a shorter sentence. In the appeal, Mahek’s barrister, Christopher Millington KC, highlighted that her response to the blackmail was disproportionate, and that her youth and immaturity had been insufficiently considered during sentencing.
Lord Justice Warby, delivering the judgment, agreed that Bukhari’s youth and immaturity were significant factors that had not been given due weight. He also remarked that her response to the blackmail was disproportionate and that there was no clear link between Saqib’s behavior and the violent incident that followed. Despite this, the judge ruled that Bukhari’s reduced sentence reflected a more balanced view of the mitigating factors.
Manslaughter Sentences Reduced for Other Involved Parties
Along with Mahek Bukhari’s sentence reduction, the Court of Appeal also reduced the sentences of other individuals involved in the murders, including Ansreen Bukhari, Rekan Karwan, and Raees Jamal, who were all jailed for murder. Additionally, Natasha Akhtar, Ameer Jamal, and Sanaf Gulamustafa, who were convicted of manslaughter, also had their sentences adjusted.
Ameer Jamal’s sentence was reduced to 12 years and 8 months, while Sanaf Gulamustafa had his term cut to 12 years and 9 months, and Natasha Akhtar’s sentence was lowered to 9 years and 8 months. The judges found that the initial sentences had been excessively harsh and needed to be reduced to reflect the minor roles played by the defendants.
Public and Legal Reactions
The reductions in the sentences of those involved have sparked mixed reactions, with some feeling that the revised sentences do not sufficiently reflect the gravity of the crimes. However, legal experts noted that the judgment was influenced by the mitigating circumstances, particularly the youth and immaturity of some of the defendants, and their lesser involvement in the fatal car chase.
The case continues to raise questions about the balance of aggravating and mitigating factors in determining sentencing, with the judges acknowledging that the violent and reckless nature of the car chase posed a high risk of death or serious harm.
What Happens Next
While Mahek Bukhari’s reduced sentence has been welcomed by her legal team, the victims’ families and many in the public are left grappling with the aftermath of a tragic and senseless crime. The impact on the families of Saqib Hussain and Hashim Ijazuddin remains profound, with their loss continuing to reverberate through their communities.
As the appeals process draws to a close, the revised sentences have been implemented, but the case serves as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by reckless behavior and the impact of blackmail on vulnerable individuals.
This story may be updated with more information as it becomes available.
